On my wall there's this gigantic newspaper article on Lee Kuan Yew. Everyday, I can't help but look at his face for a few seconds. Sometimes, I take some time off to read the article itself, which is about how LKY avoids ageing.
On the other side of the room is the bookshelf and there are two books which I take out to read occasionally: Men in White, a book on PAP's early history, and the Memoirs of LKY (in Chinese). (To be fair I have The Fajar Generation too, it is a book written by LKY's enemies)
In a sense my room, other than being used for studying and recreation, is somewhat of a shrine to LKY. I can't say that I've met the man in person or really know how he's like, but he's become the very symbol of pragmatism and excellence that I have come to put on my "shrine". It's not really the man, but the symbol, or rather what I have interpreted of the symbol.
So why am I writing about this all of a sudden? Actually it's not a random musing, rather I just want to share here how 2010 for me has been characterised by a struggle between two invisible forces in my private world: pragmatism, personified by my elderly hero, and altruism/idealism. It is so inevitable, as you cruise along in life's journey, that you learn to cast aside your ideals and look at stark reality as it is. But yet you don't want to lose your ideals and your soul as well.
Besides being an intellectual struggle, there were real repercussions of this battle in real life, namely how I've come to view Residency and my career choice. It is tempting that at some point, you hop onto the bandwagon because everyone is doing so and you don't want to lose out in terms of material progress. In fact, LKY himself sanctioned the building of casinos because he noticed the Westerners were doing the same!
I've in fact come close, like what LKY has probably already done so, to believing that the world is not about who's "right" or "wrong" but rather the "winners" and the "losers". So what if the Barisan Socialis politicians were truly righteous? They rotted in their jail cells anyway, unable to make any tangible change to society during that time. So what if you think that Residency has 101 flaws, such as forcing people to make early decisions? You don't like it, then it'll be given to the grateful Dukies and foreign based students and rightfully or not, you'd most likely languish outside the system, unnurtured and neglected.
But by the grace of God, I've not lost my grasp over the knowledge of what is more righteous than the other. The idealistic/altruistic force, visualised in my mind as the person of Jesus Christ, has stopped me from sliding into mere nihilism. (Jesus stands for many other things as well but I'll leave it here).
And hence, that was the role of God in my life in the year 2010. It is not the ideal role of God in anyone's life but I'll just write about what is, rather than what should be.
Also, by God's grace, I've learnt that it is possible to come to behold the true value of your endeavours, beyond material enrichment. Honestly the idea of doing research started out simply as a means of jumping on the Residency bandwagon. Somehow in the middle, perhaps through some epiphany, I saw the value of exploring the deep dark unchartered territory which is Cancer.

And it's not because it has claimed the lives of some family members. Big deal, I mean, it is such a common disease, and I'll be blunt enough to tell you that the same calamity is likely to befall YOU as well. Statistics show that. On the other hand, the real reason is that I've come to see how the world is facing such a massive, complex enemy.
Mention TB, and we can say that it is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis which replicates in macrophages, and it is treated by isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide etc. Talk about jaundice, and we can classify its causes, and very likely an ERCP removes the stone responsible for the condition.
But cancer. We are not entirely sure of how Nature and Nurture interact to produce this calamity. The drugs that we give cause terrible collateral damage, and more often than not the cancer cells, seemingly with a mind of their own, learn to be resistant. It causes tremendous pain and discomfort, it can be recurrent and it certainly deserves the title of the Emperor of all Maladies.
I've come to see this disease as more than a chapter in the textbook, or the killer of some people I know, but as sort of a dream. I need not be an oncologist (but by God's grace, God's grace...), and I'd like to do whatever I can in the future to participate in the battle against it. Screening at the primary healthcare level. Maybe palliative care. Research perhaps.
How nice it would be, to be part of a generation that ushers in a giant leap in the revolution of cancer treatment. Ways and means that are not painful, not nauseating. That are precise and efficacious. There is much research done on immunotherapy, on genetics and epigenetics. You'd know, friends, that someday you'd likely be part of it. General surgeon, immunologist, paediatrician, nurse, healthcare policy administrator. Anything.
So I mean with regards to the book above, it is a chronicle of how great clinicians and scientists of the past have fought against the disease. I've bought it recently at $26 and it has been a page turner (when I find time among patho revision to look at it). Not only is it informative, with a crisp style of writing that I aspire to, but it reminds me that there's so much to look forward to in Medicine. More so than the grades, the residency, the people you don't like and some questionable organisations.
It is a pleasant reminder that we are not here just to survive or to climb up the social ladder. But to find our niche in this world and perform our duties to the best we can. To fulfill dreams.
And to borrow a quote from a great movie: Don't chase success. Chase excellence, and therafter success will chase you pants down.


